Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
Nov 16, 2013 8:00pm EST
word for it. the scholarship used by the proponents is this article in the yale law journal by professor emerson where he says clearly that after the equal rights amendment is ratified the courts would have to strike down nonsupport laws which impose the duty of support on men only. now, this takes away from the wife and mother her legal right to be a full-time wife and mother and to bring up her baby in her own home. i think that's a basic and most fundamental right women have. then you move into the second area, which is the area of the draft. of course, as you know, women are not subject to the draft like men are today. there's no dispute about the fact that the equal rights amendment will positively make women subject to the draft and on an equal basis with men. again, we can refer to the same law journal article used by the proponents in congressional debate and in the state legislative hearings, and it's spelled out in page after page of how women will have to carry the same 40 to 50 pound packs, women will be sent into combat on an equal basis with men. you can't even
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)